wholesale Combined Grinding Machine

Under the Cinematograph Act 1952, we once did have a board of film censorship. Of course, I am appalled by filmmakers who are insensitive to disabilities. Our diversity comes in the way of certifying films. Every sentence would be peppered with it. The audience here ranges from the completely unlettered to the highly educated. People with disabilities are subjected to ridicule and their condition is used to raise laughs. Nishant had a problem. No government can allow public order to be disturbed. The language we hear on the screen reflects that. The language is an integral part of character development.How different is the present case related to Udta Punjab It is very different. Different regions have different issues. But what if a difficult CBFC chief acts tough on the grounds that the film has elements unsuitable for universal viewing A filmmaker knows best the kind of film he or she has made and what kind of audience the film is meant for.Most filmmakers want their films to be given a U certificate.

Today Universal Cylindrical Grinding Machine online one can watch just about anything on television, the Internet and on other multimedia platforms. There was a time when if you went to London and interacted with the working class or members of the British Army, the use of the F-word was very common. We can’t be blind to the reality of a changing world.But films do often face the threat of violence in our country, don’t they Yes. Censorship isn’t the solution. A film cannot be exhibited if it is unconstitutional. That is a given in any country. But there was violence outside the halls in Mumbai and Delhi where it was screened. It has ruled that Udta Punjab is a film for an adult audience and deals with a social problem, and that it should be released without cuts. The films that were made in those days kept that in mind. The high court has given the right verdict. So, Indian cinema took a step away from the real world and that is the way it developed in the early decades. We have to go by the demands of the times we live in. They are used solely for comic purposes..Yes indeed, Indian cinema today, in terms of the language that it uses and the themes that it tackles, has moved far closer to reality.So you are suggesting that there is more reality in Indian films today. The Central Board of Film Certification’s job is to certify films, not censor them.

That is an area we have to think about. What the language in a film does is provide the background of the characters and set up the story. It is really about the sensibility of the people who make such films.How do you see the Bombay high court verdict on Udta Punjab I wholeheartedly welcome the Bombay high court judgment on Udta Punjab. So the government was forced to ban it in order to avert a serious law and order situation.A lot of censorship disputes arise these days over foul language used in films.Why, then, are we so touchy about the use of expletives in films Cinema in India was, since its very birth, designed for the urban middle class, which was educated and accustomed to a certain kind of language. In many parts of India, expletives are used as a punctuation. It gives the audience clues about where a character has come from and what kind of person s/he is. The reason was all political. But nobody really paid any heed to the actual meaning of the word. That is definitely hard to digest.So would you recommend that such films be subjected to censorship I am personally against censorship of any kind. That is the sort of language that you hear all the time around you.When you submitted your own first few films in the mid-1970s — Ankur, Nishant, et al — did you face any censorship trouble Oh yes, most of my films had trouble.What is your take on the entire film censorship question Officially, there is no censorship today.